What if we cloned Nietzsche?

One thing I think about a lot: what if we cloned Nietzsche? You know, what if we cloned him back in the 19th century, and didn't tell his clone that he was Nietzsche's clone?

Nietzsche was a pretty good writer.  And he was a bitch.  He was at times witty, insightful, cutting - the "stylus" - occasionally devastating.  He had a way with the one-liner - the "apothegm" as he called it.  Sometimes he could pack more meaning into a brief, offhand, dismissive remark than most writers can convey in a hundred pages.  But... 

You get the sense, reading these jabs, of both restraint and indulgence.

Take the "Untimely Meditations."  To my taste, they're timely - all too timely.  When I read Nietzsche's essay on David Strauss, my only thought was, "Him?"  Why bother?  Undoubtedly Nietzsche was trying to ingratiate himself to Bruno Bauer, his only reader, his "entire public" as Nietzsche called him.  It's like philosophy youtubers who feel compelled to reply to whatever Jordan Peterson is saying.  In twenty years, no one will remember who Jordan Peterson was.  Apparently David Strauss was a big deal back then.  Nietzsche couldn't resist writing about him, no matter how undignified or tasteless it might be. He similarly couldn't hold back his resentful snipes at other influences such as Schleiermacher and Mainländer.

Which brings me back to the question - what would Nietzsche have said about Nietzsche? What sneering bon mot would a clone, with all of Nietzsche's rhetorical powers, have leveled at Nietzsche himself?  Surely he wouldn't have been able to resist saying something.  I'm always searching for that one magic phrase that I could use to devastate Nietzsche - the single, knock-out blow.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Sam Harris is Wrong About Free Will

Image
  "Free Will" vs. "Determinism" What does it mean to have "solved" a philosophical problem?  This is, in itself, a philosophical problem.  I don't feel comfortable saying I've solved any philosophical problems, but what if I propose a notion of having "minimally solved" a problem - that is, not necessary coming up with the right answer, let alone an answer that will end the debate for everyone, but coming up with the general shape or framework (perhaps missing some important specifics) of an answer that satisfies me , at least to the point where the problem doesn't endlessly torture me and keep me up at night?  If, by "solved," we mean "minimally solved," then I think I have solved the problem that is usually called the debate between "free will" and "determinism".  Not that my answer is particularly original.  Actually, not I, but modern neuroscience solved this puzzle.  And all I mean is tha...
Read more

Against Curtis Yarvin, a.k.a. Mencius Moldbug

Image
  CURTIS YARVIN IS A POSTMODERNIST  "They Hate Us For Our Freedom"   Since 2007, there has been a tiny, marginal movement on the internet, or several overlapping movements, started by a person named Curtis Yarvin, better known by his assumed name, "Mencius Moldbug."  (I'll use that name; it's less obscure.)  Spreading out from Silicon Valley, where it first became trendy, the movement(s) have been known by various names.  Moldbug originally called his political philosophy "formalism" - at that time, he was advocating for the government being run in the style of a corporation - especially a Silicon Valley startup - with a powerful CEO.  But that never caught on, and he abandoned it in favor of "neo-cameralism."  But this turned out not to capture anyone's imagination either, and so other names appeared: the Dark Enlightenment, neo-monarchism, and most famous of all, the "NeoReactionary movement" - NRx for short.  Are all thes...
Read more

The First Thing Marxists Must Learn

I've made the point many times that the problem with Marxism is that it isn't scientific enough. How can we make Marxism more scientific?  This is a huge project, and there are many directions to pursue in the process of attaining this extremely difficult goal.  But there is one aspect of the problem that absolutely must come first: The first thing that Marxists must learn, if they are going to get anywhere at all, is this: Marxists must learn to live with other Marxists. Emo Philips joke:  'Once I saw this guy on a bridge about to jump. I said, “Don’t do it!”  He said, “But nobody loves me.”  I said, “God loves you.  Do you believe in God?”  He said, “Yes.”  I said, “Are you a Christian or a Jew?”  He said, “A Christian.”  I said, “Me, too!  Protestant or Catholic?”  He said, “Protestant.”  I said, “Me, too!  What denomination?”  He said, “Baptist.”  I said, “Me, too!  Northern Baptist or Southern...
Read more