Posts

The Lenin Maneuver

  The Lenin Maneuver Lenin was a brilliant strategist.  Anyone who wants to be a successful politician should study his example and the clever tactics he used.  One of these many tactics is a particular tactic that Lenin used so often and so effectively that I think it ought to be called "the Lenin maneuver," although I don't mean to imply that he was the only politician, or the first to use it.   The Lenin maneuver is useful when one is competing against rivals for leadership within a political movement.  The Lenin maneuver is a two-part move, a move in two, seemingly opposite directions, sometimes one after the other, but quite often both at once.  To pull off a Lenin maneuver, one must: 1. ruthlessly attack and criticize one's opponents, AND 2. substantially adopt their positions.  The way to make oneself stand out as a leader is to simultaneously humiliate and eliminate one's competition, and to present oneself as the next best thing, so that ...
On this blog, I've argued that the aesthetic of materialism is boring. I've also stated that philosophy is whatever I find interesting. Therefore, to be a materialist philosopher means learning how to say something interesting about the boring. 

Good and Evil

    It's true that Nietzsche wrote a book entitled "Beyond Good and Evil".  But don't be too quick to assume that, just because Nietzsche wrote a book with this title, that implies that Nietzsche believed that good and evil don't exist.  It's perfectly possible to believe fully that there is a real difference between good and evil, and, at the same time, to be able to speak of something that is "beyond" this distinction.  In an analogous way, "north" and "south" are real directions, but there are places where this distinction is no longer so clear or relevant - such as, floating in intergalactic space.  Likewise, "port" and "starboard" are meaningfully and usefully distinct, yet they have little applicability outside of a boat or some similar vessel, "stage left" and "stage right" only make sense in the context of a stage, and so on.

Jesus in Hell: Day 1, Part 10: Flashback: Procula's Castle

Start at the Beginning Previous Chapter: Day 1 Part 9   Procula’s Castle     You, Dismas, press yourself against one of the pillars of the Domus.  You are confident, in your element.  You see a guard striding into the house.   You follow him in, pull out a bag, slip it over the guard’s head while putting the guard into a sleeper hold, and then drag the guard’s unconscious body into a supply closet.  Moments later you emerge wearing the guard’s clothing.  You sneaks further into the house.     You hear people talking nearby, and quietly sneak up and peak into the room.  You see a middle-aged, rich-looking woman, reclining on a sofa.  Beside her, standing nervously and slightly bowing is her advisor.  As you watch, suddenly a gorgeously-dressed young woman enters the room.  She displays the arrangement of her fine clothes to the older woman, with a little sashay.  Sitting at the feet of the middle-aged woma...

Jesus in Hell: Day 1, Part 9: Dismas and Gestas battle the Girgashites

  Start at the Beginning Previous Chapter: Day 1 Part 8 Dismas and Gestas emerge out onto the plain.  Dismas climbs up out of the valley that surrounds the stream first.  He is solemn of countenance, alert yet unwavering.  Gestas pops up behind him.  His eyes are darting this way and that.  A loud noise suddenly startles him.  "What was that!?!" "It was nothing.  Come on, let's go." "No, I definitely heard something, over there, by those bushes.  Say, Dismas, would you mind if I could have that knife back?" Dismas walks on, silently. "What are we doing, anyway?  Finding that woman's kids?  How is that any of our business?  That is so you, Dismas - always going off on adventures, without the least bit of- There it is again!" Now it's unmistakable: something is rustling in the bushes.  Something... big. Dismas circles around and confronts the beast.  It's a dugong.  It's huge: at least 10 feet long, and ferocious....

Fascism as a form of postmodernism

  As an anti-fascist, at the level of economics and politics, I believe in a workers' movement for economic democracy: worker ownership and control of the means of production.  Culturally, I am not just pluralist and "libertarian": in my opinion, deviation from conformity should not only be tolerated, it should be actively promoted.  At the level of ideas, lifestyles, etc., we should have as much difference and variation as possible.  I consider the multiplicity of worldviews and forms of life an intrinsic good and a goal in and of itself.  I also think it has positive consequences, because, as Frank Zappa said, "Without deviation from the norm, progress is impossible" - in science, in literature, in art, in popular culture, and at just about every level.  If promotion of such cultural pluralism implies conflict, then conflict should be encouraged. I do not consider postmodernism a reliable ally in either my economic/political aims, nor in my cultural aims....
The purpose of government today is inflation.  That is why it exists.  Capitalism is inherently deflationary.  It tends toward a crisis of values.  In a (hypothetical) perfect capitalist economy, prices would deflate all the way to zero.  The result would be a tremendous crisis - the word "recession" does not cover it - a cataclysmic depression, the likes of which the world has never seen.  Realistically, prices would be unstable, with some prices spiraling into negative territory, and others skyrocketing - to say nothing of the prices of purely financial instruments, including money itself, which is one of the things that would eventually become worthless, but which might fluctuate wildly beforehand.  We almost had a little taste of something like such a moment at the advent of the Great Depression, but it was heavily muffled and mediated. Government's purpose in the 21st century is to prevent that, by artificially propping up prices - that is, artifi...