Posts

How I disagree with Yudkowsky

I've written a lot on this blog about how much I hate and oppose utilitarianism.  Mostly, this is because I think utilitarianism is unscientific.  It should therefore come as no surprise that I am opposed to "Effective Altruism," which is a recent, and particularly nasty form of utilitarianism.  I don't especially blame Yudkowsky for this - I put the blame much more on Peter Singer and others who founded this movement.  But one must admit that Yudkowsky and his followers did quite stupidly and uncritically go along with this nonsense, and it led them to terrible errors. Some people think that Yudkowsky and his followers are wrong about AI.  But I think they are wrong about humanity .  (And therefore, perhaps, slightly wrong about AI as well, in so far as AI is built by humans, trained on human creativity, marketed to humans, and, as a product, determined by the human-created capitalist economy.) I think they are profoundly wrong about human desire.  O...

Some common sense principles and a radical idea

1. A person should be able to do anything they want to their own body: dress how they want, get whatever piercings or tattoos they want, get any surgery they want, take any medication they want, etc..  A person should also be able to not do anything their own body that they don't want to do. 2. People should should be able to fuck whomever they want, so long as everyone involved is a consenting adult.  Also, obviously, a person should also be able not to fuck anyone they don't want to fuck. 3. No one should be discriminated against, as workers, for any behavior that falls under common sense principles 1 and 2. 4. People should be legally allowed to say whatever they want.  Included in this is: people should be legally allowed to call each other whatever they want, including mean, nasty, rude names.  No one should be discriminated against for exercising their free speech, either - especially outside of work, but even at work, so long as it doesn't interfere wit...

Adam Conover's Conspiracy Theory Doesn't Make Sense

Image
I like Adam Conover.  I've watched him since the CollegeHumor days.  He's funny, he's smart, and I agree with a lot of the stuff he's said in the past.  I'll probably agree with a lot of stuff he says in the future. But recently, he uploaded a video, "AI Existential Risk Was Invented to Distract Us" which seems pretty half-baked.   Now I don't really think that it's very likely that AI will kill everyone.  I think it's much more likely that AI enslave us or make us doglike.  (To see my list of probabilities, click here.)  That said, I don't think it's impossible that AI will kill or hurt a lot of people.  Just unlikely.  And even though it's unlikely, it's important that we take steps to make sure it doesn't happen. But Conover thinks that people like me, who are concerned about this, are just big dummies, suckers, rubes, who have had the wool pulled over our eyes.  According to Conover, we are victims of a conspiracy - a v...

The Problem of Propaganda

  People usually associate propaganda with politics, especially movements like Bolshevism and fascism.  But the term "propaganda," which is a Latin word, was originally used by the Catholic Church, to describe texts written and mass-printed for the propagation of the faith - usually to people of different faiths, who often spoke different languages.  Propaganda has been used by a wide variety of organizations - religious groups, clubs, fraternal organizations, corporations, etc., etc.. Even so, there has been a rich history of debate about propaganda within the political realm, particularly within the world of Marxism - and this debate has a wider application for everything from the fan base of pop stars to organizations of collectors of model trains and beyond. The problem is this: on the one hand, there is theory - pure, highfalutin theory.  But theory can be very complex and difficult to understand.  So, on the other hand, there is often a countermovement to ...

One fundamental problem with Utilitarianism

  Utilitarianism is not essentialist.  But human pleasure is essentialist.  And so is human desire.  Therefore, utilitarianism misses something fundamental (indeed, essential) about human desire and pleasure.
 Fundamentally, liberals believe that everything is detachable.

Best Guess

  Here's my best guess as to the composition of what we know as the Bible, and I'll briefly mention the foundation of several other religions as well.  A couple notes, first: the word "Bible" is derived from a Greek term, biblia, which is plural, thus signifying "books" rather than "book".  "Biblia" is the root of many words in many languages which mean "library," and that's what the Bible, as we know it today, is: a library of many books.  Each of these books came from different sources, and often an individual book had multiple sources.   The Bronze Age:  Sumer  Starting somewhere around 5300 BCE, and for many, many centuries after that, Sumerian culture was developing, in the form of several city-states - Ur, Uruk, Eridu, Larsa, Kish, Umma, etc. - in the southern region between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in what is now Iraq, from which they continually struggled against their ancient rivals over the Zagros mountains,...