Related image

Greek myths: There are a bunch of gods, but they’re all kind of jerks.

Norse myths: There are a bunch of gods, and they’re really big jerks, and then they all murder each other and then they’re dead, the end.

Egyptian myths: There are a bunch of gods and they’re real weirdos and along with being gods they do magic, which is just excessive, and sometimes one god turns into another god which is really weird and they’re all just turning into each other and chopping each other up into little pieces and feeding the pieces to fish and then putting them back together and no one knows what it means.

Zoroastrianism: There are a bunch of gods that are jerks, but then there are other gods that are nice, I guess, but primarily their niceness is that they just fight against the jerks constantly in a big war and then they win the end.

Mahabharata: Kinda the same as Zoroastrianism except now the good guys are the bad guys, our side is the nice guys, your side is the jerks, everyone has slightly different names, and again there’s a war, but we win, so there. And then the nice guy gods decide to stop being warlike and become all holier-than-thou.

Bhagavad-Gita: So in the middle of the above war one of the gods is like maybe I should stop being a jerk and killing all these other gods who are also my cousins. And then this other god who is a really special god is like No! Don’t stop! Because everything is transitory and if you saw my true form it would really freak you out, so do it. Kill your cousins.

Rg Veda: So there’s this god Durga and she killed a whole bunch.

Ramayana: Yeah he killed some folks too.

Gilgamesh: Yep him too. But also he was sad.

Biblical Judaism: There’s a god and he’s a really big jerk but he’s the only one we’ve got.

Talmudic Judaism: Okay but if you get to know him, there’s another side to his personality and he’s almost nice.

Kabbalah: Actually there are ten sides to his personality. And they range from nice to jerk to completely inscrutable and confusing. Mostly that.

Christianity: There’s a god and he’s kind of a jerk but he had a son who was nice but you killed him.

[first posted to facebook, August 3rd, 2018]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Liquefactionism

Image
“To Dissolve Man” An Investigation into the Liquefactionist Party In the 21st century, we will have to deal both with the odious Liquefactionists and with a confused and reactionary anti-Liquefactionism, which is far more apparent and obviously horrifying. I borrow the term “Liquefactionist Party” from William S. Burroughs, who writes about the Liquefactionists in the “Parties of Interzone” section of Naked Lunch - which, as a political policy guide, is unmatched in its insight and accuracy.  He writes that, “ The Liquefaction program involves the eventual merging of everyone into One Man by a process of protoplasmic absorption. ”  He goes on: “It will be immediately clear that the Liquefaction Party is, except for one man, entirely composed of dupes, it not being clear until the final absorption who is whose dupe.” Paradoxically, Burroughs goes on to tell us that “Liquefactionists in general know what the score is.”  If they know the score, how can they be dupes?  Perhaps thi
Read more

Why Ayn Rand was Wrong

  It is a pet theory of mine that the "greatness" or "importance" of a philosopher is mostly determined by that philosopher's subsequent degree of influence on a government leader.  Would we still talk about Socrates, if his student Critias had not taken over Athens as the leader of the Dictatorship of the Thirty?  Would we talk about Aristotle, had he not tutored Alexander, who later became Alexander the Great and took over a vast part of the ancient world?  Would we remember Rousseau, had not Robespierre declared him "divine"?  Or Locke and Montesquieu, had not the founders of the United States revered them?  The esteem given to the philosophy by professional professors within the academy matters less, and its internal coherence, or insight, or truth matters less still.  By this measure, Ayn Rand is, unfortunately, the most important philosopher of the 20th century.   Even though she is barely noticed by philosophy departments, Ayn Rand is massively
Read more

Why Capitalism is Ending

Image
THE PRODUCTIVITY BOMB Sorry, Ray Kurzweil , there will be no singularity.  As much as Moore’s Law has become a cliche, it has also become a cliche to point out that exponential growth has no "knee" - that is to say, that an exponential growth curve has no inflection point.  It goes up faster and faster, so that not only is the value rising but the derivative of the value is also rising (that is, the rate of increase is itself increasing) yet at any given point it is still a gradual increase.  Growth that gets indefinitely huger as it approaches a specific point of time, a limit known as a singularity, is not exponential growth but rather hyperbolic growth .  There’s no evidence that technology is growing hyperbolically; it is “only” growing exponentially.  Gordon Moore himself has stated that he doesn't believe in the singularity, or even in the continuation of Moore's Law.   (And Moore's Law is starting to fail, anyway ... )  But it hard
Read more