Derrida positions himself as the savior of the text - a messianic figure, to be sure. Like every good messiah, he saves the text, and, in order for the text to achieve salvation, according to the text, the text must be overturned. The text overturns itself: he the mere vehicle of the text's glorious self-overcoming.
Why Sam Harris is Wrong About Free Will
"Free Will" vs. "Determinism" What does it mean to have "solved" a philosophical problem? This is, in itself, a philosophical problem. I don't feel comfortable saying I've solved any philosophical problems, but what if I propose a notion of having "minimally solved" a problem - that is, not necessary coming up with the right answer, let alone an answer that will end the debate for everyone, but coming up with the general shape or framework (perhaps missing some important specifics) of an answer that satisfies me , at least to the point where the problem doesn't endlessly torture me and keep me up at night? If, by "solved," we mean "minimally solved," then I think I have solved the problem that is usually called the debate between "free will" and "determinism". Not that my answer is particularly original. Actually, not I, but modern neuroscience solved this puzzle. And all I mean is tha...
Comments
Post a Comment